[Table of Contents]
[Previous: Insurrection]
[Next: Bulbouts? baloney]
Here's what the project's proponents claimed about separation of bicyclists from
pedestrians:
Here's what a nationally-recognized expert on such issues says:
Michael Ronkin, Rosalie Anders, of the Community Development Department, City of Cambridge, agrees, in an e-mail message of Thursday, October 14, 2004. Go figure.
|
What MIT and Cambridge built, February 13, 2003. A group of
students wanders
around on the sidepath. Why? They are waiting for a campus
shuttle bus that stops here. In the background, a car
backs across the sidepath.
Even under very light traffic conditions in February, a
bicyclist has left the
designated sidepath to avoid a pedestrian. Who is supposed to yield right of
way here? Who knows? Now imagine more crowded conditions
(break between classes, warmer weather... see below.)
Warmer weather: April 18, 2004, a Sunday
Same location, 5 PM, June 10, 2005, alumni leaving a
reunion talk which
discussed campus improvements including those to Vassar Street.
The emergency phone begins to resemble the Leaning Tower of Pisa...
What about inline skaters? April 30, 2004: this one chooses
the bikeway's
asphalt surface; the boutique block pavers elsewhere
give a rough ride on tiny skate wheels. With flailing arms and legs,
a single inline skater occupies the entire bikeway.
April 30, 2004. More haphazard use of the bikeway. The
bicyclist in
the background is heading to the Building 39 portal by the usual
wrong-way route. A truck is parked on the bikeway, too.
They were warned.
|
[Table of Contents]
[Previous: Insurrection]
[Next: Bulbouts? baloney]